1.
a) heat. Heat has the potential to disturb
homeostasis by altering an individual’s body temperature to such an extent that
their organs begin to fail, possibly fatally (hyperthermia). Excessive heat is
responsible for more deaths, globally, than excessive cold (hypothermia). If
the body temperature reaches 105-107 degrees and remains that high for a few
days, death is usually the result. Theoretically, hyperthermia would be
especially difficult for people of a shorter, thicker stature to tolerate
because that kind of body shape is ideal for colder climates; the layer of fat
that would be useful in a colder climate would be detrimental to the
individual’s health if that person was faced with conditions that instigate
hyperthermia.
3.
Short-term
adaptation: An example of short-term adaptation would be radiation (loss of
heat from the body in heatwaves, to the surrounding atmosphere) in response to
excessive heat. Likewise, evaporative cooling is a short-term adaptation which
is particularly effective in climates that are not only hot, but also
significantly dry.
Facultative
adaptation: If an individual moved to a warmer climate from a colder
climate, it is possible that their appetite would be suppressed because of the
heat, causing them to lose the layer of fat designed to keep them warm and thus
be able to cool off more efficiently. According to Bergmann’s rule slimmer
individuals have an easier time cooling off (i.e. they lose heat to the
surrounding atmosphere more quickly) because they have a larger surface-area-to-volume
ratio.
3. In many ways I think that observing human variation across environmental clines is a good way to preserve the perspective that while we all vary according to our environment, we ALL vary; the reasons we are different from one another are the same everywhere. Many tribes in Africa have traditional clothing that exposes a lot of their skin, and this could be for the same reasons Southern Californians wear shorts (cultural adaptations). In other words, this kind of study allows us to see the similarities between populations worldwide, which is perspective-changing in and of itself.
4. I don't think race can be used to explain any of the adaptations I listed in question 2. Race is generally not a fruitful lens through which to study science or the variation of human populations; indeed, using race scientifically led to a staggering amount of historical atrocities. The study of environmental influences on adaptations is much more effective, because it allows us to observe similarities between different populations who perhaps live on parts of the globe with similar environmental conditions (the similar skin pigmentations of South Indians and some populations of Africa, for example).